In the case Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, what did the Supreme Court determine about FAPE?

The Supreme Court's determination in Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley clarified what constitutes a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The ruling emphasized that FAPE is meant to provide educational benefits that are tailored to the specific capabilities and needs of students with disabilities.

In this case, the Court established that schools must provide an education that is not only appropriate but also beneficial, ensuring that students with disabilities receive the support they need to make satisfactory educational progress. This decision underscores the idea that FAPE is not about maximizing potential in an absolute sense but rather delivering a level of benefit that is meaningful and ensures access to the educational curriculum.

The focus on providing educational benefits aligned with student capabilities is essential, as it allows for the recognition of individual student needs rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. This decision set a precedent for the interpretation of FAPE, emphasizing the need for effectiveness and meaningful engagement with the educational process, which continues to influence special education law and practice today.